__LIMITS :__

Let y = f(x) be a given function defined in the neighbourhood of x = a, but not necessarily at the point x = a.

Basically we are interested in examining the behaviour (or tendency) of the function f(x) when the distance between the points x and a is small, i.e. is small but not zero.

The limiting behavior of the function in the neighbourhood of x = a when |x–a| is small is called the limit of the function when x approaches a.

Mathematically we write this as lim_{x->0} f(x).

Let lim_{x->0} f(x) = l . It would simply mean that when we approach the point x = a from the values which are just greater than or just smaller than x= a, f(x) would have a tendency to move closer to the value ‘ l ’ .

This is same as saying, “difference between f(x) and l can be made as small as we feel like by suitably choosing x in the neighbourhood of x = a”.

Mathematically, we write this as, lim_{x->0} f(x) = l , which is equivalent to saying that

such that 0 < |x-a|< δ and ε depends on δ .

Where ε and δ are sufficiently small positive numbers.

It is clear from the above discussion that if we are interested in finding the limit of f(x) at x = a, the first thing that we have to make sure is that f(x) is well defined in the neighbourhood of x = a and not necessarily at x = a

(that means x = a may or may not be in the domain of f(x)), because we have to examine it’s behavior or tendency in the neighbourhood of x = a.

Now the following possibilities may arise;

(a) Left tendency of f(x) is same as it’s right tendency, as shown in the adjacent figure.

That means when we approach x= a from the values which are just less than a , f(x) has a tendency to move towards the value ‘ l ’ (left tendency).

Similarly when we approach x = a from the values which are just greater then a, f(x) has a tendency to move towards the value ‘ l ’ (right tendency).

In this case we say f(x) has limit at x = a i.e. lim_{x->0} f(x) = l

**(b)** When the left tendency is not the same as the right tendency, as shown in the adjacent figure.

Clearly left tendency (l_{1}) is not the same as right tendency ( l_{2}). In this case we say limit of f(x) at x = a will not exist.

**(c)** When the left tendency and/or the right tendency is not fixed, (as shown in the adjacent figure).

It is clear that in this case, the function has erratic behavior in the neighbourhood of x = a, and it will not be possible to talk about the left and the right tendencies of the function in the neighbourhood of x = a.

In this case we conclude that the limit of f(x) at x = a will not exist.

From the above mentioned discussion, it is clear that the limit of f(x) at x = a would exist if and only if f(x) is well defined in the neighbourhood of x = a (not necessarily at x = a) and has a unique behaviour in the neighbourhood of x = a.

If any of these conditions are not fulfilled the limit of f(x) at x = a will not exist.